There is a certain justification, somewhat, in having knowledge of things when under the pretense of nonchalance; that little glint of knowing that momentarily flashes right across the iris is too fleeting that it would have remained amiss had it not been anticipated. Is it so wrong to feign nonchalance when the objective is simply to avoid unwanted conversation, not for the lack of intellectual aptitude to grasp a topic or the emotional quotient factor that allows one to carry on such a conversation, but simply, one choses not to participate. Why all the objections over such a simple, yet definite, choice when it is more convenient to simply stay mum?
No comments:
Post a Comment